Committee Meeting Raises Doubts
on Gender Equality
and Sexuality Education in Japan
Japan's Basic Law for a Gender-equal Society went into effect
in June 1999. In December 2005, the Japanese Cabinet revisited
and endorsed a basic plan to promote gender equality.
The plan aims, for example, to raise the ratio of women in
decision-making positions in the government to 30% by fiscal
2020. Other goals include introducing part-time working hours
for government officials to assist with care for children
or other family members, and companies will be urged to hire
mothers back into the workforce.
At a Committee
on Cabinet, held on 24th February 2006, Yoko Komiyama,
MP, Democratic Party of Japan, and shadow minister, asked
Kuniko Inoguchi, Minister, State on Gender Equality, what
the word 'gender' defined in the revised plan.
Inoguchi replied that government wanted to make it clear
that traditional values would not be sacrificed, and that
the plan aimed to promote better understanding of gender equality.
The law was not very explicit as prefectures were expected
to make their own bye-laws, and the government felt that strict
policy would alienate people.
In June 2005, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) conducted
a survey on gender equality and sexuality education in Japan
and posted the results on its website. The survey team was
headed by Shinzo Abe, who has now become Chief Cabinet Secretary.
The results of the survey appeared to be very one-sided, showing
that sexuality education in Japan was inappropriate for certain
age groups, or excessive, and that gender equality was undermining
traditional Japanese values.
Komiyama asked Secretary Abe, the person responsible for
the implementation of the Basic Law for a Gender-equal Society,
if it was appropriate for him to do so given his history with
the survey.
Abe replied that he would support Inoguchi in what she had
said.
Rising tide
There is a rising tide of conservatism in Japan toward women's
rights and sexuality education, and there is growing concern
that Japan's conservatives may yet adversely influence ODA
policy where reproductive health and rights, and gender equality
are concerned.
|